#Windows vs mac gui android
In the mobile sector, which comprises of both tablets and smartphones, the two most dominant operating systems are Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS. Following that, we have macOS by Apple Inc and Linux in the second and third place respectively.
#Windows vs mac gui windows
In the world of desktop, the most dominant OS is the Microsoft Windows which enjoys a market share of approx. There are several operating systems that are available in the market. Linux and Windows Performance Comparison.Linux and Windows OS Brief Introduction.The evolution toward a common UI will likely be slow, and take several versions to complete.
#Windows vs mac gui for mac
Just like Mac users would be really disoriented if we made Rhino for Mac look like Rhino for Windows, Windows users would feel equally disoriented if we made Rhino for Windows instantly look like Rhino for Mac. User interface programming frameworks have changed a lot since 2007, and making an application that looks native on both platforms, feels familiar on both platforms, and also feels familiar when switching platforms, is much easier now (but still not easy). Again, it was a choice to follow the mac paradigm more than the Rhino one. I also hope the default is the mac-like one.Īnd you’re right that it’s frustrating having the same UI show up in different places on both platforms. I’m hoping we can have both on both platforms at some point, and let you pick. When I’m on Windows, I dearly miss the UI-friendly “command line” on Mac. And, the differences between Windows and Mac are painful on a number of levels: learning, teaching, switching back and forth.Īnd, I think many of the UI changes to macOS are actually improvements over the Windows version. Our mac dev team spent a lot of time on this, and I personally think they did a great job. Our goal with Rhino for Mac was to create a UI that was familiar to Mac users. This is a fair representation of the 2007 position, but things are and have been changing over the years. The philosophy behind having two different interfaces is highly debatable but that’s just the way it is. The decision to not make a unified interface was taken way back in 2007 and it’s not likely to change. Hope to see some major changes on the Mac side, especially now that we’re going to a new era with the Platforms, all I can say about that is that it doesn’t always apply, certainly when it comes to the a unique, powerful and proven workflow. I’ve been a Mac user for 25 years and I’m well aware of philosophical differences between the Other companies managed to unify the interface with minor reasonable differences, can’t see why not
I know there are some platform specific limitations such file system and graphic subsystem butĪs other mentioned, Rhino is a unique experience that should carry over to every platforms. (I’m sure expert users have many work arounds) While I can figure out theĭifferences running on a Mac, the workflow is sluggish at best ,when compared to windows as far as I can manage. Watching many online tutorials, I’m getting very envious at windows users. It seems that with Rhino 7 that issue took turn for worse imo. I’ve seen some posts about the subject but no real conclusions or take-aways why such a stark difference.
0 kommentar(er)
